Company directors have strict legal obligations to act in the best interests of their company. These fiduciary duties, set out in the Companies Act 2006, govern how directors must manage company affairs, avoid conflicts of interest, and prioritise the company's success over personal gain.
When directors breach these duties—whether through negligence, self-dealing, or misconduct—they can face serious legal and financial consequences, including personal liability, director disqualification, and, in some cases, criminal penalties.
This article outlines the key fiduciary duties of company directors, common breaches, and the legal consequences that may follow. If you or your business face a fiduciary duty issue, contact our solicitors for expert legal advice.
What are a director's fiduciary duties?
The Companies Act 2006 sets out a director's statutory duties, which reflect their broader fiduciary obligations. The key duties include:
These duties ensure directors act responsibly and in the company's best interests rather than for personal gain. A breach can lead to significant legal and financial consequences.
Who are the duties owed by and to whom?
Under Section 250 of the Companies Act 2006, a "director" includes any individual occupying the position of director, regardless of their title. As a result, the general duties apply to all company directors, including de jure directors, de facto directors, and non-executive directors.
According to Section 170(1) of the Companies Act 2006, these duties are owed to the company. They are not owed to shareholders, creditors, or co-directors.
Common ways directors breach fiduciary duties
Directors can breach their fiduciary duties in many ways, including:
Even unintentional breaches can have serious consequences, so directors must act with care and seek legal advice when in doubt.
What are the legal consequences of a fiduciary duty breach?
Directors who breach their fiduciary duties can face legal action from the company, shareholders, or regulatory authorities. Consequences may include:
As the general duties are owed to the company rather than individual members or creditors, only the company can enforce them. However, in certain circumstances, shareholders may bring a derivative claim in the company's name or issue an unfair prejudice petition, which can sometimes include a claim for relief in the company's name.
Boardman v Phipps [1967]
A well-known case illustrating how courts assess fiduciary duty breaches is Boardman v Phipps [1967]. This case involved a solicitor and a beneficiary who used confidential trust information to acquire a controlling interest in a company. Although their actions benefited both themselves and the trust, they failed to obtain full consent from all beneficiaries.
The House of Lords ruled that, despite their good intentions, they had breached their fiduciary duty due to the inherent conflict of interest. The court ordered them to account for the profits made, despite no deliberate wrongdoing.
This case highlights two key principles:
This case illustrates why courts impose strict remedies for breaches of fiduciary duty, particularly in cases involving conflicts of interest. Depending on the severity of the breach, courts may order directors to compensate the company, return misused assets, or surrender profits gained from their position.
What remedies are available for breach of fiduciary duty?
In addition to these general consequences, courts can impose specific remedies for breach of fiduciary duty, depending on the severity and impact of the breach. A court may issue an injunction to prevent ongoing or imminent breaches or order restitution, requiring directors to return misappropriated assets or unjust profits.
In cases where a director has personally profited from their actions, the court can impose an account of profits, forcing them to surrender any gains obtained through improper use of company information or assets. If a transaction resulted from a breach, the court may order rescission, effectively undoing it. Directors may also face damages, requiring them to compensate the company for financial harm caused by their actions.
The availability of these remedies depends on the nature of the breach and its impact on the company or shareholders. Courts have broad discretion in deciding how to rectify the situation, ensuring that any remedy imposed is appropriate to the circumstances.
How can a director defend against a fiduciary duty breach claim?
Directors may have a defence against claims of fiduciary duty breaches if they can demonstrate:
Practical steps for directors facing a potential claim
If a director is accused of breaching fiduciary duties, they should take immediate steps to protect their position. These include:
By taking these steps, directors can strengthen their defence and mitigate the risk of legal consequences while working towards a resolution that protects both their position and the company's stability.
Why expert legal advice is essential
Fiduciary duty breaches can lead to serious legal and financial consequences, making early legal intervention crucial. Whether you are a director facing allegations or a shareholder concerned about misconduct, professional advice can help assess the situation and determine the best course of action.
Our corporate and litigation solicitors specialise in director duties, shareholder disputes, and company governance issues. If you need advice, contact us to discuss your options.
Expert legal advice
for directors